Thursday, May 5, 2011



Abortion Rights: Mother, Doctor, or Government?
            Over forty million people worldwide choose to have an abortion, over one million of which are in the United States.  Now the question is, should the decision for abortion be up to mothers, the doctors, or the government? People who are anti-choice think that abortion should be outlawed completely.  People who are pro-choice believe that it’s the mother’s decision on what to do with hers her child’s life.  And some people feel it should be up to the doctor if the pregnancy may cause health risks to the mother.
            Abortions have been performed for thousands of years, even before the Roe vs. Wade when abortion was legalized.
            The Roe vs. Wade case would change abortion laws making abortion legal in the United States during the first trimester of pregnancy.  After the first trimester abortion may only be performed if health risks are involved to the mother.  Before this case hit the Supreme Court floors abortion was illegal in most states.  This case was decided primarily on the ninth amendment.
            The ninth amendment reads, “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people”.  The ninth amendment is on modern day issues such as abortion, the right to die, and gay rights. The ninth amendment, like the rest of the Bill of Rights, is to limit the power of the federal government, not the state government. The ninth amendment is sometimes called the forgotten amendment.  An amendment that is almost equally forgotten is the fourteenth amendment. 
            The fourteenth amendment states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”.  What does this mean?  You are responsible to make decisions for yourself and you have the right to life, liberty and property as a citizen of the United States of America.  The right to abortion is in the word liberty.
            Some facts about abortion that you may not have known before from abortionno.org are:
·         The number of abortions performed per year worldwide is approximately 42 Million
·         The number of abortions performed worldwide per day is approximately 115,000
·         83% of all abortions are performed in developing countries.
·         17% occur in developed countries.
·         1.37 Million abortions occur in the United States as of 1996.
·         Approximately 3,700 are preformed each day in the United States.
·         52% of women having abortions in the United States are under the age of twenty-five.
·         Women aged 20-24 obtain 32% of all abortions.
·         Teenagers obtain 20% of abortions.
·         Girls under 15 accounts for 1.2% of abortions.
·         White women obtain 60% of all abortions.
·         Black women are more than three times more likely as white women to have an abortion.
·         Hispanic women are about two times as likely as white women to have an abortion.
·         About 64% of all abortions are performed on never married women.
·         Married women account for approximately18% of all abortions.
·         Divorced women obtain estimated 9% of all abortions.
·         Women identifying themselves as Protestants obtain about 37% of all abortions in the U.S..
·         Catholic women account for 31%
·         Jewish women account for 1%.
·         Women with no religious affiliation obtain 23% of all abortions.
·         Women with family incomes less than $15,000 obtain 28% of all abortions.
·         Women with family incomes between $15,000 and $29,999 obtain 19% of all abortions.
·         Women with family incomes between $30,000 and $59,999 obtain 38% of all abortions.
·         Women with family incomes over $60,000 obtain 13% of all abortions performed.
·         1% of all abortions occur because of rape or incest.
·         6% of abortions occur because of potential health problems regarding either the mother or child.
·         93% of all abortions occur for social reasons.
·         52% of all abortions occur before the 9th week of pregnancy.
·         25% of all abortions happen between the 9th and 10th week.
·         12% of all abortions happen between the 11th and 12th week.
·         6% of all abortions happen between the 13th and 15th week.
·         4% of all abortions happen between the 16th & 20th week.
·         1% of all abortions happen after the 20th week of pregnancy.
·         An estimated 43% of all women will have at least 1 abortion by the time they are 45 years old.
·         47% of all abortions are performed on women who have had at least one previous abortion.
Abortion has been an argument for thousands of years now.  It’s legal now but there is still debate.  But who should be responsible for abortion: the mother, the doctors, or the government? One percent of all abortions occur because of rape or incest.  Six percent of abortions occur because of potential health problems regarding either the mother or child. And 93% of all abortions occur for social reasons. If it were up to mothers, as it is now, the facts above would remain the same.  If it were up to the doctors only six percent of the abortions that occur today would happen.  And if it were up to the government very few abortions would occur.
From the article below from newyorktimes.com, titled “The Issue of Abortion Returns to Center Stage in U.S. Politics”: written by Luisita L. Torregrosa, you can see that abortion is a subject that has been heavily debated on worldwide for many years.
“Abortion, a topic that provokes little political debate in Europe, has re-emerged as a burning hot issue in United States politics, stirring up the bitter and sometimes violent discussion that has been raging for decades between anti-abortion forces and supporters of abortion rights.
Caught up in the debate between conservative Republicans and liberal Democrats are women and their reproductive systems.  
This time it’s newly installed Republicans in Congress, winners of the 2010 midterm elections on the shoulders of energized grass-roots Tea Party activists, who are lending fresh impetus to the anti-abortion campaign during the arguments over the size, shape and content of the United States’ budget.
With no intention to consider raising taxes to increase revenue, the Republicans are determined to cut back social programs linked to Democratic Party policies, in education, energy and health care. Few of those programs are as odious to conservative hard-liners as Planned Parenthood, which they see as an abortion machine being fed by the federal Treasury.
Seizing an opportunity to appeal to their base, conservative Republicans marked Planned Parenthood for extinction during the budget debates. They won the vote in the House of Representatives last week but lost on Saturday in the Democrat run Senate.
In the run up to the votes in Congress, prominent Republicans lost no opportunity to demonize Planned Parenthood. Representative Michele Bachmann, the Minnesota Republican who is a likely presidential aspirant, described Planned Parenthood as “the LensCrafters of big abortion,” referring to the international retailer of prescription eyewear.
Planned Parenthood is not all that big. It receives about $363 million in federal government grants, according to its 2008 - 2009 reports. Not a cent of federal aid can be legally used for abortions, which make up only 3 percent of the organization’s services, which also include prescribing contraceptives and offering birth control advice, cancer screenings like mammograms and tests for sexually transmitted diseases.
Of course, the debate was not entirely about money, or even about the Republican drive to trim or overhaul major social programs to reduce the budget and the deficit.
The argument was also one of ideology, values and divisive, ingrained biases and principles that seemed dormant in the past few years, when the conservative focus was trained on fiscal and economic issues.
But with the Tea Party movement setting the direction, the abortion issue seems sure to resurface in the coming battle over the nation’s $14.2 trillion debt limit, which some Republicans oppose raising. It will also surface during negotiations on a $4 trillion debt-reduction package that are likely to figure prominently the rest of this year and into the 2012 presidential campaign.
So why all the anti Planned Parenthood fiery? Since abortion services make up a small fraction of its services, no federal funds are used for abortions, and 65 percent of Americans support continued federal funding for the organization, according to a CNN poll, why are conservatives up in arms about it?
“The fact is that 95 percent of the contraceptives on the market kill the baby in the womb,” Jim Sedlak of the American Life League told the New York Times columnist Gail Collins in a column last week. In other words, some in the anti-abortion camp regard birth control as a form of abortion. In their eyes, Planned Parenthood is in the abortion business.
One of the Senate’s most senior Republican members, Jon Kyl of Arizona, in a fit of anti-abortion fever, said on the Senate floor: “You don’t have to go to Planned Parenthood to get your cholesterol or your blood pressure checked. If you want an abortion, you go to Planned Parenthood, and that’s well over 90 percent of what Planned Parenthood does.” He later retracted the statement.
On “Fox & Friends,” the Fox network’s morning show, a panelist trying to play down the importance of Planned Parenthood suggested that the majority of its services — counseling, breast exams and Pap smears — could be found at Walgreens, a national drugstore chain.
“Did you know you could get Pap smears at Walgreens?” joked Stephen Colbert on his late-night comedy show.
In New York, where Planned Parenthood was founded by Margaret Sanger in 1916, the abortion rate is among the highest in the United States: 40 percent of all pregnancies against 20 percent nationwide, according to New York City’s health department.
The statistics, and what they imply, serve to fuel both sides of the debate, prompting Archbishop Timothy M. Dolan of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New York to call for efforts to reduce the number of abortions in the city, which has averaged 90,000 a year. On the other side, feminist groups stand firm against any curbs on the city’s abortion-rights law, the most lenient in the United States.
But in the end, statistics, jokes and protests aside, it is the highly personal and emotional content of the abortion debate, not the theory or the numbers or the science, that fires it up and makes it such a potent and painful issue.”
            From the article above you can see that there will always be dispute on the subject of abortion. People don’t only have a political opinion in what they believe is “right” but also a personal opinion.  Religion plays a factor in what people believe when it comes to abortion, as does many other factors.
A timeline of reproductive rights from prochoice.org are:
“1821: Connecticut passes the first law in the United States barring abortions.
1860: Twenty states have laws limiting abortion.
1965: Griswold v. Connecticut Supreme Court decision strikes down a state law that prohibited giving married people information, instruction, or medical advice on contraception.
1967: Colorado is the first state to liberalize its abortion laws.
1970: Alaska, Hawaii, New York, and Washington liberalize abortion laws, making abortion available at the request of a woman and her doctor.
1972: Eisenstadt v. Baird Supreme Court decision establishes the right of unmarried people to use contraceptives.
1973: Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision strikes down state laws that made abortion illegal.
1976: Congress adopts the first Hyde Amendment barring the use of federal Medicaid funds to provide abortions to low-income women.
1977: A revised Hyde Amendment is passed allowing states to deny Medicaid funding except in cases of rape, incest, or "severe and long-lasting" damage to the woman's physical health.
1991: Rust v. Sullivan upholds the constitutionality of the 1988 "gag rule" which prohibits doctors and counselors at clinics, which receive federal funding from providing their patients, with information about and referrals for abortion.
1992: Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey reaffirms the "core" holdings of Roe that women have a right to abortion before fetal viability, but allows states to restrict abortion access so long as these restrictions do not impose an "undue burden" on women seeking abortions.
1994: Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act is passed by Congress with a large majority in response to the murder of Dr. David Gunn. The FACE Act forbids the use of "force, threat of force or physical obstruction" to prevent someone from providing or receiving reproductive health services. The law also provides for both criminal and civil penalties for those who break the law.
2000: Stenberg v. Carhart (Carhart I) rules that the Nebraska statute banning so-called "partial-birth abortion" is unconstitutional for two independent reasons: the statute lacks the necessary exception for preserving the health of the woman, and the definition of the targeted procedures is so broad as to prohibit abortions in the second trimester, thereby being an "undue burden" on women. This effectively invalidates 29 of 31 similar statewide bans.
2000: Food and Drug Administration approves mifepristone (RU-486) as an option in abortion care for very early pregnancy.
2003: A federal ban on abortion procedures is passed by Congress and signed into law by President Bush. The National Abortion Federation immediately challenges the law in court and is successful in blocking enforcement of the law for its members.
2004: NAF wins lawsuit against federal abortion ban. Justice Department appeals rulings by three trial courts against ban.”
You can see how the laws have changed through out the past almost two hundred years. It went from completely illegal to legal with doctor’s consent to completely legal even with out doctor consent.  At one point in time they wouldn’t even give married couples information on pregnancy prevention. But as you can see, laws change.
            In conclusion, who do you think should have the final decision on abortion:  The mother, the doctor, or the government? If the government or doctors had control of when abortion could occur the abortion rate would drop greatly. Over forty million abortions a year world wide, that’s too many!  Although abortion seems as if it will always be a debate among us.

English-102
2/24/11
All’s Innocent in the Land of the Lion King
By: Shannon Bradburn
                Disney does an excellent job of appealing to people of all ages. Walt Disney’s main purpose in life was to put a little magic in the imagination of society. Creating movies with some worldly ties was Walt’s way to show the viewer that “magic” can be around every corner. Margaret Lazarus feels that Walt’s movies are possibly too worldly.
                Lazarus uses the animated motion picture “The Lion King” as her example of Disney being too worldly. Stereotypes are found all over in this movie. The golden lions are the rulers of the animal kingdom; Scar- the uncle of the young cub, Simba- is representing the gay community; the hyenas live in the ghetto; the strong lionesses are the worried women; and the “commoners are the lions prey. To be brief, in the movie Scar takes over the kingdom when his brother dies. The lionesses just worry about how they will survive with no food or water. In the end, Simba returns to take his place as king. Lazarus states that the message is that those born to rule are the only ones to change society (Lazarus, 2).
                The argument Lazarus is trying to make is a very valid point; however, Disney has to appeal to the adult audience as well as the children. Disney throws in adult humor in many, if not all, of his movies. Lazarus states, “…Children were given hidden messages that can only do them-and us-harm,” (Lazarus, 2). By only focusing her argument on one move, it doesn’t show enough support to this statement. I don’t feel that in “The Lion King” Disney was trying to be so stereotypical. The lesson that many children- including myself, as a child- should get from “The Lion King” should be that of good conquers evil, not racism.
                Lazarus, being a mother, shows concern as she writes this essay. She is trying to encourage other parents to show similar concerns because of the “inappropriateness” in the Disney movies. Lazarus would do an excellent job persuading my parents, if she would have used more than just one example. Lisa McCoy, my mother, stated, “Lazarus would be more believable if she would include more movies: Movies like Dumbo, The Aristocats, and Aladdin,” (Interview).  Lazarus’ Logos is very diminished by only using one example as to how Disney is giving children hidden messages.
                Lazarus’ Pathos shows in this essay. She plays with the emotions that many families have for Disney and she twists them. She shows emotion with the children too. Showing the parents how these movies could be harming their children causes an emotional imbalance in the way in which the parents will look to Disney movies. This was a very good way to pull on the reader’s emotions by using the love of children and Disney movies to her advantage.
                The Ethos shown in this essay is very clear. Lazarus is very against stereotyping, at least in children’s movies. She feels the need to make it understood that teaching young children about stereotyping is wrong. I would have to agree, stereotyping in children's movies should be prohibited; however, many children don’t notice the racial comments, the stereotypical scenes, or the sexual humor. The little comments, jokes, and gestures that are not appropriate for the children are slipped in to the movies, not for children to learn or to even catch on, but for the adults to get a little enjoyment out of the child’s movie as well.
                Lazarus makes many valid points in her essay. As an adult you will find many inappropriate things in Disney movies, but many children don’t notice. I don’t see the harm in letting a few suggestive comments or scenes in a children’s movie. The child watching the Disney movies are looking for the magic within the movie, not the “hidden” meanings. Lazarus does a wonderful job using ethos, pathos, and logos in her writing. The flow of her paper was easy to follow and had very nice transitions. Overall her essay was great. I feel that she could have improved her Logos by showing more examples to back up her thesis. I still think that Disney is one of best things that has happened to the childhoods of many, but I do see where some parents could find the movies offensive. Maybe it is because of Disney’s humor and comments that some of the movies are rated PG and not just rated G.

Blogfolio Reflection

  • How have you developed as a writer this semester?
    • This semester I learned how to write at a more advanced level. I have a hard time organizing my thoughts to make my thesis strong. This semester has taught me how to organize my thoughts to make a stronger paper than before.  
  • What lessons about writing can you apply to other classes?
    • There are many lessons I can apply to other classes. One of the big ones is using academic essays as research. I found that when I used these reliable essays as sources I get better, credible feedback. Being prepared is another lesson that I can take to other classes and other aspects of life.
  • What do you feel is your best piece of writing in your portfolio? Why?
    • I feel that my rhetorical analysis on All's Not Well in the Land of "The Lion King" by Margaret Lazarus is my strongest piece. I think it is my strongest because I knew the topic very well. As a child, and even today, I watch Disney movies. I knew where Lazarus got her stance on her article, but I can also see where Disney is harmless. I feel that by knowing and consciously dealing with the topic for approximately 12 years, I analyzed the article very well. I could see the strengths and weaknesses in Lazarus' essay very simply. I feel that I put too much research in my research paper, and that I didn't analyze the summary well enough. I felt that these two papers were strong, but my rhetorical analysis paper was better.
  • What strategies have you used to overcome some of the challenges of writing this semester?
    • I had many challenges with my thesis sentences, introductions, and conclusions. I have struggled with theses for as long as I can remember. I never feel that they are as strong as they could be. Professor Micer pointed out many helpful lessons in our book that has helped me through this course. When I was at home I would have my mother look at some of my drafts and let me know what she thought I could do with them as well. 
  • What were your strengths in writing?
    • I am very modest. I honestly don't know what my strengths are in writing. I know I can get a few good arguing points, but I can never seem to word them correctly to make them as powerful as I would like. What can I say, I am my own worst critic.
  • What areas do you need to continue to develop as a writer?
    • I need to work on my thesis statements, introductions, and conclusions. These are the three things I feel I need the most work on. I don't ever feel like these are as strong as they should be. I feel like my conclusions leave more questions than answers and my introductions give more answers than questions.

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Abortion Rights

I found my Students' Right topic to be a bit difficult in findings. The input I was receiving from others was almost exactly what any scholarly literature said. I am going to change my topic to Abortion Rights. Does this right stretch to the doctor, the mother, or the government? I feel the choice of an abortion should be given in certain cases. If the mother will die or be paralyzed from having the baby I feel the option for abortion is necessary. This option would be given by the doctor and the choice would be made by the mother. In the case of a rape, the mother should have the option for an abortion. The only problem with the rape, is there must be substantial evidence that a rape had indeed occurred. I especially feel abortion should be an option for the mother if there was a rape and the mother is barely a teenager. I feel the government should not have a say in who can or who can not have an abortion. I don't feel abortion is the only option but in certain severe cases it should be.

Thursday, March 31, 2011

Introduction

Hi! My name is Shannon Bradburn. I am eighteen years old. I was born and raised in LaPorte, Indiana. I enjoy watching movies and going out with my friends and family. I am obsessed with Dolphins! =) I am the first of my siblings to step foot in a college class or graduate from high school. I'm not sure if that is a great accomplishment considering I only have two older brothers and one younger. I think it's an accomplishment enough. I graduated from LaPorte High School in 2010. I am a freshman at Purdue North Central. I am majoring in Pharmacy. I work at Sears in Michigan City, and I am currently looking for a job in LaPorte.

Thursday, March 24, 2011

Student Rights (Brief)

Do students really have all the rights they are entitled too? Do schools drain the rights from the students? The right to privacy is just one of the many student rights that are pushed to the limit. The lockers provided at school are a way to provide privacy to the student. Is this really a way a privacy? If the faculty decided to do a search on the lockers, they bring trained dogs into the school and they look for things that shouldn't be in the building. If a locker seems to pop out in the search, the student who is using the locker will then come to open it for a more thorough search. This is an invasion of the students’ privacy. Yes, it helps to protect the other students, but it is also limiting where the students' privacy is really located. Has the privacy rights been limited to the restroom?


This is a very brief summary of PART of my issue. More will come later on.